LegalBrandGuard

Glossary of takedown and brand protection terms

Updated on August 5, 2026 · LegalBrandGuard

Illustration of a network of interconnected legal and technical terms, symbolizing the takedown and brand protection glossary

Quick answer

The 18 terms that come up in every case against a fake site. Each definition also states what it means in practice — a domain status or a regulation article only matters for what it allows or blocks.

Threats

Fake shopfakeshop
An online store that reproduces an existing brand's identity — name, logo, photographs, descriptions — to collect payment for orders it will never ship.
Distinct from classic counterfeiting: the model doesn't rely on selling copies, but on collecting payment without shipping — sometimes compounded by fraudulent reuse of the payment card data collected.
Cybersquatting
Registering a domain name that reproduces a brand you don't own, generally to resell it to the rightful owner or to divert its traffic.
This is the situation the UDRP procedure was historically designed for, since it rests precisely on the similarity between the domain name and the mark.
Typosquatting
A variant of cybersquatting that exploits common typing mistakes — a doubled, missing, or transposed letter, a neighboring extension. The domain captures users who mistype the address.
Watch for false positives: a domain that looks like a typo of a brand can belong to a completely unrelated business. Verify the site's actual activity before taking any action.

Procedures

Takedownnotice and takedown
A notice sent to the technical intermediaries of a fraudulent site — registrar, hosting provider — to obtain its suspension or removal. An administrative step, not a judicial one.
The trademark owner can initiate it directly: no legal representation is required. The outcome sought is the domain being placed in clientHold status.
UDRPUniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy
An arbitration procedure established by ICANN that lets a trademark owner obtain the transfer or cancellation of a domain name registered in bad faith.
It requires proving three cumulative elements: similarity between the domain and the mark, the holder's lack of legitimate interest, and registration and use in bad faith. Expect roughly three months and arbitration fees.
URSUniform Rapid Suspension
An expedited domain suspension procedure, designed as a lighter-weight alternative to the UDRP for clear-cut cases of infringement.
It suspends the domain without transferring it, requires a higher standard of proof than the UDRP, and only applies to new generic top-level domains, not legacy .com.

Technical terms

clientHold
An EPP status applied by a registrar that freezes a domain name. The domain stays registered to its holder but stops resolving: no website, no email.
It's the concrete result of a successful takedown, and it's public: querying the registry is enough to verify it has been applied, without waiting on a reply from the registrar.
serverHold
The equivalent of clientHold, but applied by the extension's registry rather than the registrar. Same effect: the domain stops working.
Its presence signals that action was taken above the registrar level — often following a complaint to the registry, or by court order.
Registrar
An accredited company that sells domain names to the public and registers them with the registry. It's the party that can suspend a domain.
Every ICANN-accredited registrar carries an IANA ID, which is more reliable for identifying it than its trading name — company names change, the ID doesn't.
Registry
The organization that manages a given extension and holds the authoritative record of registered domains. Verisign for .com, Afnic for .fr.
The registry sits above the registrar. Contacting it directly is a useful recourse when the registrar remains unresponsive.
RDAPRegistration Data Access Protocol
A protocol for querying domain name registries, successor to WHOIS. It returns structured JSON data, where the abuse contact is identified by its role.
The switch happens extension by extension. The .shop extension retired its WHOIS service on 1 May 2026 in favor of RDAP alone; others are following.
WHOIS
The legacy protocol for querying registries, which returns free-form text whose format varies by the registry queried.
It remains usable on many extensions, but its gradual phase-out in favor of RDAP makes querying both essential.
EPPExtensible Provisioning Protocol
The protocol used for exchanges between registrars and registries. A domain's status codes — including clientHold and serverHold — come from this standard.
Reverse proxyCDN
A service that sits between a site's visitors and its origin server, to speed up delivery and protect it against attacks. The visible IP address becomes the service's, not the real server's.
Practical consequence: on a site protected this way, tracing back to the origin host is impossible from the outside. You have to go through the service's abuse report form, which relays the complaint.
Certificate Transparency
A public log where every TLS certificate issued by certificate authorities is recorded, within seconds of issuance.
Useful for brand monitoring: a certificate issued for a domain reproducing a brand often appears there before the corresponding site gets indexed by search engines.

Legal grounds

DSA Article 16Regulation (EU) 2022/2065
The provision requiring hosting providers to operate a notice-and-action mechanism. A notice containing the required elements is deemed to give the provider actual knowledge of the illegal content.
The effect is decisive: once that knowledge exists, the liability exemption under Article 6 stops applying if the provider fails to act promptly. The regulation covers services offered to recipients in the Union, regardless of where the provider is established.
RAA Section 3.18Registrar Accreditation Agreement
A clause in the accreditation agreement binding registrars to ICANN, requiring them to publish an abuse contact address and to process the reports they receive.
A contractual commitment, not a binding legal standard: failure to comply is handled through an internal ICANN process. Some registrars publish the required address while reserving it for law enforcement.
Lumen Database
A public database that records content takedown requests sent to technical intermediaries, for transparency purposes.
Several companies, including Cloudflare, forward the reports they receive to it. The complainant's name, email address, and company become publicly viewable there — better to use a generic business address than a named one.

Go further